There are many difference between Leaders and Managers

Q 1 on that point be m any(prenominal) an new(prenominal)(prenominal) remnant between leading and Managers. Explain 5 Major releases with relevant examples. On a close look it screw be seen that many screwrs atomic number 18 not attractors, though successful in their field. Leaders lead from the cause and passenger cars believe in guiding compulsive and planning and improving the ability of the organization. A music director makes the subdues to take on, a attraction work with the population. Management philosophers and calculateers contribute been touch oned in identifying the rest between a private instructor and a leader. Some leading show focusing skills and some gutters show leaders skills.It is now well established that thither is difference between a manager and a leader. A leader leads from the front. His language leave behind be wish come let us do the work. On the otherwise submit a manager believes in planning and coordinating the work. He uses management techniques to manage others. Fol impoverisheders voluntarily follow the leader. This whitethorn not be the case with managers. Subordinates is been asked to obey the instruction of the manager by deservingness of his position. The subordinates whitethorn be obeying the manager on his leadership skills or may be just as it is part of their duty.It is also common the subordinates shun the manager and still follows his action to save his or her job. A leader has his interest common to the coadjutors. When the common interest is being identified, nation voluntarily follow him. Rather than asking the people to work, a leader prefers to resound them for work and they just follow the instructions of a leader. This eventful fictional character makes a big difference between the call of mathematical process of a trough and a leader. 1 Difference in working mien There is a big difference in the working style of a manager. A leader attracts the people with the chari sma he is having.He used to defy an upper hand in technological companionship than the workers. Leadership may not have any relevance with the occasioning of the organization. On the other hand the management is different in its instruction of functioning. A manager keeps the organizational priority at his best. He has to do certain delegates as per the guidelines snip by the organization. He then plans to pass this by his people. Here the manager uses the sophisticated management tools. He is interested in directing, planning and organizing. To make this effective he also uses modern management tools. A leader innovates and the manager administers.Leadership is setting up vision and Direction and management is implementation of this. A leader set his vision and the followers follow his vision almost voluntarily. He r bely requests force to attract towards him in execution of his committee and vision. On the other hand the manager executes the vision of the organization. On his journey towards this he will also be using leadership skills to effectively manage his people. A manger with leadership skills plunder effectively manage the organization. There should be a force attracting the followers or a subordinate to the person directs them.In case of leadership it is often the timber of the leader or his charisma that attracts the people to him. On the other hand the manager and the leader should be the two sides of the coin. Latest management trends show an inclining towards improving the leadership qualities of a manager. It is accepted that a manager should mitigate the output of the organization but it should be on the cost of the people working in the organization. 2 Directing Function The directing function of the manager is making people ready to discharge certain task or assigning certain task to the people.This functional ara of the manger has to a greater extent to do with leadership. Once a task is to be performed, the touch on manag er has to detail people or direct people to reach out the task. This is mostly d mavin in different ways by a manager and a leader. However both leader and a manager use the function of directing. Followers voluntarily work as per the direction where as manager needs to have something else for motivating the people to work. This may be different to different organization and also as per the management style it differs. Organizations have special structure and policies to motivate the people to work and managers atomic number 18 part of it.In the field of emergency medical service the directing function of the manager has a lot to do with bit jobs. Things be to be done at laid-back pace and many meters immediate ratiocinations argon to be taken. The chances of going these decisions wrong are high. In this scenario subordinates should be motivated and encouraged to take decisions at time of emergency. Also the manager should be able to provide directions without any delay. His competence as a leader is very important. A leader comes transport to take the responsibility of the actions of his followers.The followers also recognize this fact and there are more people willing to work under a leader under emergencies. This is what actually needed in an emergency service. At the same time the leader should be conversant with the procedures adopted in an emergency. A manager is a technical person and he is potential to be thorough in procedures and policies. Union of managerial qualities and leadership skills will be a estimable formula for emergency medical services. 3 Emotional Intelligence Leaders are emotionally more knowing than unremarkable managers. A manager wants to be successful should have high emotional knowledge.Emotional intelligence is the ability to understand and control ones emotions and to understand the emotions of others. People having high emotional intelligence move to be leaders. According to Terry, a leader shows the way by his ex ample. He is not a pusher he pulls rather than pushes (Terry R G, 1988). A typical manager does not follow this style. He plans and direct people to get the work done. There is set of duties and responsibilities for each person in the organization. A manager ensures this is been done. He uses his control function to see things are going as per the schedule.A manger often uses his control powers. In contrast a leader expects his subordinates to perform the way it is desired. For example if a supply is coming late to his duty. The typical manager may think of taking corrective action, where as a leader may be thinking to find out the reasons behind the late coming of the staff and may be willing to support that person. Similar actions make the follower emotionally attached to the leader and they keep the individual interest lonesome(prenominal) next to the common goals In emergency medical service, emotional intelligence is a highly required quality of the person heading the operati on.A leader who is empathetic and understands the emotions of others can do a lot in getting people involved in the service. A leader should empty knee jerk reactions. It is already said emotional intelligence makes the difference in actions of a manager and a leader. A manager who is low in emotional intelligence may follow only the determine book and this kind of attitude may lead to poor quality service especially in emergency medical service. It is trade good to be knowledgeable but at the same time the managers should understand the need of being empathetic to the subordinates and the customers. 4 Functions of management Functions of management are Directing, Organizing, Planning, controlling and staffing. Professional managers are trained to perform these functions. Some people are on the view that Directing is the most important function of a manager. Many managers believe decision making is an important function of the manager. In the Emergency Medical Service Industry ma nager should be good at decision making. He will have to make decisions in seconds. A manger is trained to have these qualities. In management schools brass studies are used to impart the skills of decision making.A leader has the quality of decision making and directing, a leaders method of directing and decision making differ from that of a manager. Leaders decision are derived from that of his team members where as the managers decisions are learned decision and the decision the manger thinks to be good for the company. In respect to other function like controlling and planning a manger uses modern management tools. An ordinary leader may not know these tools for planning and controlling. Hence in these function a manger may have an upper hand in delivering the duties.But if the manager has leadership skills then he can really outperform an ordinary manager. All leading management institutes have special curriculum to sharpen the leadership skills of the managers. It is also sai d it is important to become a leader then become a manager by learning management tools. Management is managing men and a leader is expected to do this function well. Leadership involves in common interest and goal. By this common interest and goal a leader can motivate people to attain common goals.Managers seek scientific methods to perform their task. Leaders are not interested in going for such tools and management techniques. They are good motivators. 5 Managers and Leaders Successful managers are efficient leaders. Bill Gate is a successful leader as well as a good manager. There are other examples too. Most successful managers are not MBA holders rather they are good leaders. On a close view it can be understand that it is important to become a leader first than becoming a manager. Story of successful managers in all fields underlines this factor.There are other differences in the styles of managers and leaders. A manager makes his decision and then sells his decision to hi s followers. Manger compares alternatives before making decisions. He asks his subordinates to question if they have any doubt. In case of a leader his decisions are more unexceptionable to the mass and that is the reason they follow the leader. Conclusion There is a difference between leadership and management. Managers are more concerned about planning, controlling, staffing and organizing.Leaders are more concerned about directing and organizing people. They act more as a representative of the followers. People follow leaders voluntarily than by virtue of their position. Leaders should have high emotional intelligence. In Emergency Medical Service leadership qualities are more want after than mere management skills. Managers with good leadership skills can erect best result. Successful business people are good leaders as well as good manager. To be successful in the long run a manager should have leadership skills.