Sound Vs. Silence :: essays research papers

The most apparent difference between genus Dracula and Nosferatu is that ace was make while film was still without sound-at least dialogue-and the other was non. This difference, though non a revelation in itself, leads to a great number of frequently to a greater extent in-depth argumentations that deserve discussion. In making a silent film, a director must rely on sight-and a certain occur of text-to portray to the audience his intended emotional, and intellectual reaction. As a conclusion of this, the director is not able to go into in-depth character development with the aforesaid(prenominal) kind of resources as a director of film that is not silent. In the case of Nosferatu, this leads to a very limited number of characters have any kind of depth some(prenominal). This is not to say that every character does not have about him or herself a certain image, or that every character does not extract a certain emotion from the audience. It is entirely to say that a great number of characters in Nosferatu use entirely image to achieve their desired effect. For example, in Dracula, if one were to see Dracula walking down the street, an adverse reaction would be somewhat illfounded. extracurricular of his clothes, Dracula is a normal looking person. In Nosferatu, however, Dracula is much or less a freak. The end result of this is the audience having the akin image of Dracula in both movies, one achieved this through across-the-board dialogue, and one simply through the appearance of a character. Another example, in Dracula, the first character that is given any kind of development whatsoever is Renfield, and throughout the movie, Renfield is transformed first to a blood sucking savage, and so slowly returned to a character with a heart, and a little min of compassion. However, in Nosferatu, Renfield is already the blood sucking savage, cooped up in the creep bin, eating bugs when the movie starts, and the extent of his role seems to be nothing more than to provide more insight into the nature of Dracula.Perhaps the most interesting contrast between the two movies is that although they are based on the same novel, their bilgewater lines do not coincide. This is apparent in the beginning when in Dracula, Renfield is the one who travels to Transylvania, whereas in Nosferatu, bum Harker is the one who travels to Transylvania. It is not explicitly clear in Dracula who the owner of the property that Dracula purchases is however, in Nosferatu, it is clear that John Harker is the owner, and his trip to Transylvainia is for the purpose of selling the property to Dracula.